Training Hub
  • Welcome to Training Hub
  • GUIDES
    • Getting Started
    • The Verification Journey
    • Reviewing results
    • Applications
      • Creating a New Applications
      • Managing Applications
      • Reviewing Individuals
      • Understanding Customer Reports
    • Screening
      • Creating Individual Check
        • Reviewing Individuals Check
      • Creating Company Check
        • Reviewing Company Check
    • Monitoring
      • Creating a Monitoring Records
      • Managing the Monitoring Dashboard
      • Monitoring Records of Individuals
    • Account Settings
      • General
        • Company Details
        • Branding
        • Managing Users
        • Billing Details
        • Consultants
        • Data Retention
      • Application
        • Managing Application Types
        • Screening Preferences
        • Source of funds
        • Additional document
        • Forms
    • Help/ Support
    • My Profile
  • Service Information
    • What is Verify by Tiller
      • The Verify Portal
      • The Verify Mobile App
    • The Checks
      • Personal Details Capture
      • Identity Document, Biometric Face Match and Liveness
      • International Address Verification
      • PEP & Sanction Screening
      • Adverse Media Screening
      • Proof of Address Upload
      • Geolocation Check
      • Upload Documents
      • Source of Funds
      • UK Bank Account Check
    • Data Collection and Storage
    • Security, business continuity and incident reporting
  • Country Coverage Match Rates
  • Help & Support
    • FAQS
      • General Information
      • Using Verify by Tiller
      • Data Security and Privacy
      • Billing and Account Management
    • Support & Training
    • Documents and materials
    • Release Notes
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  • Sanctions Sources
  • PEP Sources and Types
  • PEPs by Association
  1. Service Information
  2. The Checks

PEP & Sanction Screening

PEP and Sanction screening uses an external data provider. They maintain a correlation database of PEP Tier 1, 2, 3 & PEP by association OECD categorises lists which are updated daily from various sources, such as official government websites or national assemblies of foreign offices, CIA World leaders lists, open source verified repositories and selected media websites.

For Sanction screening, the database is collated and updated daily from the following sources: UK HM Treasury, US Department of the Treasury - Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), US Department of State - Bureau of International Security & Non-Proliferation Sanctions, UN Security Council Committees, EU Sanction records, US Defence Trade Controls and other international government and local authority resources.

Sanctions Sources

Please see below a list of sanctions sources that the individuals is checked

Sanctions Source List
  • Australia DFAT Sanctions List

  • Austria National Bank - Sanctions

  • Bangladesh Central Bank - Domestic Sanction List

  • Belgium - Federal Public Service National Financial Sanctions List

  • Canada - Freezing Assets of Corrupt Foreign Officials (Tunisia and Egypt) Regulations

  • Canada - Freezing Assets of Corrupt Foreign Officials (Ukraine) Regulations

  • Canada Criminal Code - Terrorist Organizations

  • Canada OSFI Entities List

  • Canada OSFI Individuals List

  • Canada OSFI UN Sanctions Act Resolution on Iran

  • Canada Special Economic Measures Act - Consolidated Sanctions List:

    • Burma

    • Iran

    • Nicaragua

    • Russia

    • South Sudan

    • Syria

    • Ukraine

    • Venezuela

    • Zimbabwe

  • Dutch Foreign Ministry Individuals & Organizations with Frozen Funds

  • EU Consolidated List of Sanctioned Persons, Groups, & Entities

  • EU COUNCIL DECISION 2014/512/CFSP

  • France Directorate General of the Treasury - Terrorism

  • India - National Investigation Agency - Banned Terrorist Organizations

  • Interpol UNSC Special Notices - Entities

  • Interpol UNSC Special Notices - Individuals

  • Japan Finance Ministry Asset Freeze List

  • Japan Ministry of Economy, Trade, and Industry (METI) - WMD End User List

  • Latvia Financial Intelligence Service - Sanctions

  • Libya National Transitional Council Law 36

  • Malaysia Ministry of Home Affairs - Sanctions List

  • Netherlands - National Sanctions List for Terrorism

  • Official Journal of the European Union - EU International, Economic, Military Sanctions

  • Pakistan National Counter Terrorism Authority - Proscribed Organizations

  • Pakistan National Counter Terrorism Authority - Proscribed Persons

  • Qatari Linked Terrorist List

  • Singapore Terrorism (Suppression of Financing) Act List

  • South Korea Financial Intelligence Unit (KOFIU) - WMD End-User Controls List

  • Sri Lanka Government Gazette - List of Designated Persons, Groups and Entities

  • Switzerland State Secretariat for Economic Affairs (SECO) Sanctions List

  • UK HM Treasury Financial Sanctions Target List

  • UK HM Treasury Financial Sanctions - Ukraine Restrictive Measures

  • UK Home Office/Ofc for Security & CT Proscribed Terror Groups

  • Ukraine State Committee for Financial Monitoring - Terrorism List

  • Ukraine State Committee for Financial Monitoring - UN Sanctions Program

  • United Nations Security Council (UNSC) Consolidated Sanctions List:

    • Resolution 751 (1992) I 1907 (2009) Somalia

    • Resolution 1267/1989 Al-Qaida

    • Resolution 1518 (2003) Iraq

    • Resolution 1533 (2004) Democratic Republic of the Congo

    • Resolution 1591 (2005) Sudan

    • Resolution 1718 (2006) Democratic People's Republic of Korea

    • Resolution 1970 (2011) Libya

    • Resolution 1988 (2011) Taliban

    • Resolution 2048 (2012) Guinea-Bissau

    • Resolution 2127 (2013) Central African Republic

    • Resolution 2140 (2014) Yemen

    • Resolution 2206 (2015) South Sudan

    • Resolution 2374 (2017) Mali

  • US Department of State - Bureau of Economic & Business Affairs - Cuba Restricted List

  • US Department of State - CAATSA Section 231(d) List

  • US Department of State Consolidated Non-proliferation Sanctions

  • Chemical and Biological Weapons Control and Warfare Elimination Act (CBW Act)

  • Executive Order 12938

  • US Department of State Foreign Terrorist Organisations

  • US Department of State Terrorist Exclusion List

  • US Treasury Department FinCEN Advisory Notice on Iran, North Korea

  • US Treasury Department FinCEN Section 311 Measures

  • US Treasury Department FinCEN OFAC Consolidated Non-SDN Sanctions List

  • US Treasury Department FinCEN OFAC Specially Designated nationals List

  • US Treasury Department FinCEN Designated Charities and Fronts for FTOs

PEP Sources and Types

The individual is checked against various global sources to assess whether they are potentially a politically exposed person. Each PEP type helps categorise the type of PEP (e.g. HOS - Head of State).

PEP Sources & Types

PEP Sources

  • CIA World Leaders

  • CIA World Factbook

  • Rulers articles and other databases continually monitored to additional information

  • Gov’t/Official websites covering all levels of PEPs

  • Other open sources. For example, those independent from the state control

PEP Types

  • AMB - Ambassadors and top diplomatic officials

  • ASC - Family, close associates and advisors

  • CAB - Cabinet officials

  • DIP - Diplomats

  • FAM - Family members

  • GCO - Top executives/functionaries in state-controlled businesses

  • GOE - Government Owned Enterprises (Organisation)

  • HOS - Heads of state

  • INF - Senior officials overseeing key infrastructure sectors.

  • INT - Officer of Inter-Governmental Organisations

  • ISO - International sporting officials

  • JUD - Senior judicial officials

  • LEG - Senior legislative branch

  • MIL - Senior military figures

  • MUN - Municipal level officials

  • NIO - Senior officials overseeing non-infrastructure sectors.

  • POL - Political party figures

  • PRM - Root Subjects

  • REG - Regional officials

PEPs are categorised into tiers of risk. With Tier 1 being the highest potential risk, including heads of state and high ranking government positions.

PEP Tiers

Tier 1 - High Risk

  • Heads of state and government (including Royal families).

  • Members of government (ministers, deputies, state, and under-state secretaries) at national and sub-national levels in case of federal states (e.g., Florida in the US, Bavaria in Germany, Johor in Malaysia, Lagos in Nigeria, Goa in India etc) and provinces in China (e.g., Henan); President and College of Commissioner of the European Commission.

  • Members of Parliament or similar legislative bodies (at national and sub-national level in case of federal states – same as above); Members of the European Parliament.

  • Heads and top commanders of military and law enforcement and their deputies.

  • Heads and members of supreme courts, of constitutional courts or of other high-level judicial bodies whose decisions are not subject to further appeal, except in exceptional cases, similar for EU Court of Justice.

  • Heads and members of courts of auditors (including EU Court of Auditors) and of the boards of central banks (including the European Central Bank).

  • Top ranking officials of mainstream political parties (e.g., party leaders and members of governing bodies) and only the heads/deputy heads of minor political parties (without representation in parliament).

Tier 2 - Medium Risk

  • Members of legislative (e.g., aldermen, councillors) and executive (e.g., prefects) bodies at regional, provincial, cantonal, or equivalent levels (below the level of states in case of federal jurisdiction).

  • Judges, justices, magistrates, prosecutors, attorneys in courts with jurisdiction at regional, provincial or equivalent level.

  • Ambassadors, general consuls, high commissioners, permanent representatives, head of missions and their deputies, charge d’affairs.

  • Chairmen, secretary generals, directors, deputy directors and members of the board or equivalent function of international/regional organisations (e.g., UN, EU, World Bank, EBRD, OAS, Arab League, ASEAN, CARICOM etc).

  • Presidents/Chairperson and board members of State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs), businesses and organisations.

  • Senior officials of the military, judiciary, law enforcement agencies, central banks, and other state agencies, authorities and state bodies (e.g., high ranking civil servants, director generals, directors, heads of units, secretaries (permanent, principal, joint secretaries etc).

  • Heads and senior members of mainstream religious groups (e.g., archbishop, patriarch, cardinal, bishop, imam, rabbi).

  • Mayors of capital cities (e.g., London, New Delhi, Paris, New York, Rio de Janeiro) and Head of Cities which are directly appointed and answerable to the Chinese central government.

PEP Tier 3 - Low Risk

  • Advisers, heads of cabinet and similar roles of senior officials of the military, judiciary, law enforcement, central banks.

  • And other state agencies, authorities, and state bodies (designation/level to be determined depending on country ML/TF and corruption risks profile and administration structure).

  • Heads and board members / senior officials of Trade Unions. In case of Chambers of Commerce and Charities a risk- based approach is followed.

  • Presidents, secretary generals, directors, deputy directors and members of the board or equivalent function of international NGOs (e.g., Oxfam, Amnesty, Transparency International etc).

  • Middle ranking diplomats (minister-counsellors, councillors, 1st Secretaries and 2nd Secretaries).

  • Alternate/deputy members of parliament/senate (not currently occupying seat).

  • Mayors and members of local councils at municipal, town, village, or equivalent levels (i.e., below regional, provincial, cantonal, and other levels not captured elsewhere).

  • Senior civil servants at regional/provincial or equivalent levels; senior officials of administrative bodies at local levels (directors/secretaries of city governments).

PEPs by Association

Family members and personal and business associates of PEPs, typically individuals who are not PEPs in their own capacity but serve on a board of directors alongside PEPs. Based on FATF, Close Associates are considered to be: (known) (sexual) partners outside the family unit (e.g., girlfriends, boyfriends, mistresses); prominent members of the same political party, civil organisation, labour, or employee union as the PEP; business partners or associates, especially those that share (beneficial) ownership of legal entities with the PEP, or who are otherwise connected (e.g., through joint membership of a company board). In the case of personal relationships, the social, economic, and cultural context may also play a role in determining how close those relationships generally are (FATF Guidelines, 2013).

Should the individual have a potential match within the PEP & Sanctions sources they will be flagged up for review.

PreviousInternational Address VerificationNextAdverse Media Screening

Last updated 1 month ago